Live Chat Support

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Essay on Aristotle - His View on Women and their Role in the Society


Aristotle is known as one of the greatest philosophical thinkers of all time.  Along with Plato, his philosophy influenced may other philosophers including Saint Thomas Aquinas who is said to have “Christianized” his philosophy.  He is known as a brilliant philosopher, great political thinker, mathematician and even a scientist.

However, if he will be born today he may get the ire of many feminists because of Aristotle's views on women.  He once described women as subordinate, deformed male, and unfinished man.  He thought that women are born because of something that went wrong during the conception stage – the parents were either too young or too old or one or both of the parents were unhealthy.  Thus, he thought that women “are a deformity, but one which occurs in the ordinary course of nature.”

In addition, Aristotle's view on women noted the physiological characteristics of women are substantially different from male.  Nature has distinguished between men and women.  He described women as physiologically colder than men.  Because men are warm-blooded, he thought that men have a higher form of life compared to women.  He also thought that women are infertile men.  Aristotle considered it a deficiency for women to have lacked the ability to produce semen.  Aristotle also thought that the role of the women in child birth is limited to holding and taking care of the unborn child while the baby inherits the qualities of the men.




It should be stressed that this was only one of the views were Plato’s philosophy clashed with Aristotle’s philosophy.  Plato believed that notwithstanding the superficial differences men and women are essentially equal.  Thus, he proposed that all political offices should also be opened to women.  Because they both have the capacity to Reason, he thought that a woman can also lead a nation.

Because of the extent of his influence which lasted until after the Middle Ages, it is therefore not surprising that Western thought and tradition had adopted similar views toward women which was very unfortunate for all women.  St. Thomas Aquinas adopted the same view and thought that the role of women in procreation is very limited and it was the male who was responsible for his personality and character.

Perhaps, Aristotle's view on women was responsible why many women were denied certain rights and privileges throughout history.  In fact, before the 1960s many women were denied the right to vote.  For so many decades, only men were given the privilege to vote and this remained unquestioned until the feminists began to talk about it and speak against it.

While many have changed after the 1960s, many still harbor the same view as Aristotle towards women.  Many still think that it is unacceptable for a woman to run for public office and lead the country.  For many decades, women had to accept the role of being confined to the role of housekeepers and whose recognized skills were limited to maintaining the house.  For centuries, these beliefs were universally accepted in many nations and societies.  In fact, until now, many women still suffer from biases and prejudices.

This is a free essay on Aristotle's views on women. We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom.  If you need help we will write well written essay on Aristotle's views on women at very affordable costs starting at $7.50/page.

Essay on Plato - The Concept of Justice


Why do we have a concept of justice? Is it because of our society? Is it due to the fact that we are afraid of heavenly punishment? Is it a good thing in itself? What is justice in the first place? These are some of the questions people seek the answers to. Plato answers these in “The Republic”.

As one search for the meaning of justice in the “The Republic” written by Plato, one would probably find a lot of definitions. Two good examples are justice is harmony and justice is doing one’s job.  (Plato) However, we cannot clearly get a definiton of justice out of these two phrases. Plato also offers analaogies in order to evaluate the definiton of justice.  (Frede)

The first one is the division in the parts of the soul and the parts of the state. The soul is divided into three parts: appetitive, spirited and rational. The appetitive is the part of the soul that has no rational awareness with its desires. The spirited is the courageous and strong willed part of the soul. The rational is the part that can enable a person to make good decisions about his or her life. The state is also divided into three main types of people: workers, soldiers and rulers. In the Republic, the children are taken from their parents at birth and they will be assessed in accordance with their natural qualities.  The workers’ role is to provide food, shelter, clothes and other things needed by the state. These people are ruled by their appetitive part. The soldiers will do everything in order to defend the state from enemies. They are ruled by their spirited part. The rulers are the ones who possess wisdom. They do not want fame or power. The rulers are ruled by their rational part. Plato argues that justice is the same in the soul as well as in the state. The three parts of the soul which rules the three classes in the state will work together in order to achieve the good for the whole soul or state. When this happens then we achieve harmony.




There are no mistakes in the division of classes in Plato’s state. With the intention of identifying with the thought of a just state we must regard that each human being is working the most excellent activity he is naturally fit for. Each human being is practicing what they are most excellent at which is considered to be a virtue. One should not try to do anyone else’s job.

However, can justice really exist given these situations? Why would the workers continue to work? Why would the soldiers continue to defend the state? Plato answers that this problem will be solved by control and understanding. And which part has these qualities? There is none other than the rulers. Plato claims that there would be no justice until the philosophers became kings. The reason for this is that philosophers understood what the real meaning of justice is in the World of Forms.

Plato explains that the definition of justice is best illustrated by the parts of the soul and the state as well as their interactions.  Only the Philosopher King would rule because he clearly understands what justice is thus he will be able to be just producing a just state. Without a just state then there would be no harmony.

This is a free essay on Plato's concept of justice. We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom.  If you need help we will write well written essay on Plato's concept of justice at very affordable costs starting at $7.50/page.